The statutory risks for companies from deforestation go beyond environmental law. Investors should take note
Deforestation presents multiple risks for asset owners and managers. Supporting companies who either deforest directly or through their supply chain threaten an investor’s reputation and their bottom line. Those companies also risk legal exposure, which would have financial implications material to their investors.
Not all deforestation is illegal, but it is a vast and growing problem. Interpol estimates
that illegal logging represents $50-150bn – and that illegal logging accounts for 50-90% of all forestry activities in key producer tropical forests, such as those of the Amazon basin, central Africa and southeast Asia, and 15-30% of all wood traded globally. Law enforcement agencies are increasing their response to this threat, most notably through Interpol’s Project LEAF.
Developed countries enforce specific environmental laws to combat trade in illegal products, such as the European Union Timber Regulation or the US Lacey Act. These laws raise the risk that companies involved in products such as timber may be prosecutors.
The impacts can be substantial – Lumber Liquidators received a $13m penalty in 2016
for Lacey Act violations, for example.
Therefore, it is important that investors understand these environmental statutes. However, forest crime constitutes a broader set of activities than illegal logging or wildlife trafficking. Corruption, money laundering, human rights violations and other offences typically accompany illegal land clearing or deforestation.
Prosecuting authorities can therefore call on laws beyond environmental statutes to pursue forest crime – potentially targeting actors on the ground, the companies who deal with them, and even the investors who support their actions.
Climate Advisers has led a project throughout 2018 examining the potential of US laws. Companies should be aware of potential exposure to a broad suite of laws, including:
- Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
- The Travel Act
- Wire and mail fraud
- Anti-money laundering laws
- Conspiracy to defraud the United States (Klein Conspiracy)
- Obstruction of justice
- Securities fraud/shareholder actions
- Unfair competition laws
- Dodd-Frank Act – Securities and Exchange Commission whistleblower law
- Sanctions under the Global Magnitsky Act
For each of these laws, there are potential links to forest crime that make investigations and prosecutions possible. Climate Advisers has just released a report
detailing these laws for investors. The issue is increasingly material – prosecutors are interested in pursuing forest crime and have these “generally applicable” laws at their disposal.
The implication for investors is that illegal deforestation exposes companies to more legal risk than solely environmental laws. Investigations and prosecutions cost companies resources, reputation, and time – all factors that can harm financial performance.
The increased interest in forest crime raises the stakes for those investors exposed to the land sector. In response, they should be diligent and forthright with company management to mitigate these legal risks, or reconsider their investments in companies not actively addressing these risks.
Deforestation is of growing relevance to investors. Supporting deforestation, legal or illegal, is risky for both an investor’s reputation and bottom line.
The prevalence of illegal deforestation and forest crime, and a growing response by governments to combat it, should give investors reason for caution. The legal risks could be higher than they think, and they should respond before it is too late.
Anthony Mansell is director, policy and research, at Climate Advisers.